This video will inevitably be downvoted by
the usual suspects. Please ignore the downvotes and remember to like and share the video.
All the sources I’ve used to support what I’m saying will be listed in the Pinned
Comment of the comment section below. Here, in a nutshell, is all you have to remember: Hitler wanted to socialize the people into
a racial-community (a Volksgemeinshaft) by removing the Jews from society. The phrase “socializing the people” and
the phrase “removing the Jews from society” mean the same thing. They are the same thing.
If you deny one, you’re denying the other. Most historians do not understand basic economics;
they’ve simply not trained in economics. They do not understand what socialism is.
So they have fallen for the slogans of socialism. They have taken the Marxists at their word
when they say Hitler was not a socialist. They have taken the Marxists at their word
when they say, Hitler didn’t socialise the people (meaning, he didn’t remove the Jews
from society). But this is an issue, because the Marxists
do say that the Holocaust happened, even though they’ve just denied the ideological causes
for it. They have denied the causes of the Holocaust because they do not want people
to understand that Hitler’s socialism was REAL socialism. They don’t want people to
realise that socialism is the murder and theft of the bourgeoisie or the Jews, because people
wouldn’t support socialism if they understood that socialism is the murder and theft of
one group in society for the gain of another. So they simply reject it. But if Hitler’s not a socialist, and didn't want to socialise the people by removing the Jews from society in order to make his
wonderful People’s Community (Volksgemeinshaft), then there is no ideological explanation as
to why the Holocaust happened. They’ve undermined their own argument by distorting the historical
truth. This is why certain countries have resorted
to making laws banning Holocaust Denialism, because Marxist-influenced historians cannot
combat the argument put forth by the National Socialists, who say that the Holocaust didn’t
happen. The National Socialists know it happened: they know Hitler was a socialist, and they
know he wanted to socialize the people by removing the Jews from society – because that’s
what they want, a new racial-state. But they deny the Holocaust because to do so is an
ideological attack on their Marxist enemies. What we are witnessing here, ladies and gentlemen,
is a Leftist civil war that has been raging for decades. The Marxists want to paint Hitler
as being on the Far-Right of the political spectrum, and claim he is a capitalist. The
reality is that he was a socialist, and belongs on the Far-Left of the political spectrum.
There is little difference between a racial society and a class society – it is the murder
and theft of one group in society (the Jews or the Bourgeoisie) for the benefit of another
(the Germans or the workers). Socialism is the tyranny of the social group. Capitalism
is the freedom and liberty of the individual. But if more people knew this, socialists wouldn’t
be able to push their socialist agenda. Well, by denying Hitler’s socialism in order
to distance Hitler from their own ideology, Marxists have denied the ideological explanation
for the Holocaust, allowing National Socialists to deny the Holocaust in turn. What the Holocaust
deniers are doing is saying: “look, look, we’ve found a massive hole in your historical
narrative, and you can’t plug the gap.” They’re trolling the Marxists, who should
be ashamed that their twisted narrative of history is, in fact, helping to deny the Holocaust. The reality is that Hitler was a socialist
who wanted to socialize the people by removing the Jews from society, and thus the Holocaust
happened. So, when a Holocaust denier says that the
Holocaust didn’t happen, or that the gas chambers didn’t happen, or something like
that, all you need to do is question them. Say: “So you’re saying Hitler wasn’t
a socialist?” They’ll usually respond in some way shape or form, saying something
like “Hitler was a socialist but not a Marxist Socialist” or the like, and that’s fine.
Follow up with “But, if Hitler didn’t murder the Jews, he couldn’t have been a
socialist or wanted to create a racial-community. I guess he wasn’t a REAL National Socialist
then, and that National Socialism doesn’t promise to build a racial-state.” At that point, enjoy watching them squirm.
The foundation of their Holocaust Denialism and their entire National Socialist ideology
has been swept away. The rug has been pulled from beneath their feet. They may continue
to argue, but you will have them on the backfoot, and any further denialism actually undermines
their own argument even more so, to your advantage. Then you have the Marxist-Socialists who are
assisting the National Socialists in their Holocaust denialism, but don’t realise it.
Simply state that Hitler wanted to socialise the people by removing the Jews from society,
and that by denying Hitler’s socialism, they’re denying the Holocaust. Then when
they pull out the “It’s not REAL socialism” card, fire back by asking them: “If it’s
good to murder and steal off the Bourgeoisie, why is it bad to murder and steal off the
Jews?” and then ask them “What’s the Final Solution to the Bourgeoisie Question?
Is it Gulag or Gas Chamber?” Make sure that they are aware that by denying Hitler’s
socialism, they are denying the Holocaust. Thus: Hitler wanted to socialize the people into
a racial-community (a Volksgemeinshaft) by removing the Jews from society. Hitler’s
socialism was his racism. Denying Hitler’s Holocaust, or denying Hitler’s
socialism, is the same thing. It is denying History.
How to Ideologically undermine Holocaust Denialism
| | |