Gutfeld on the latest New York Times scandal


JESSE, DANA,>>Emily: . “THE FIVE” .” SO IT TURNS OUT THAT THE WRITERS HAVE INITIALLY INCLUDED THE FACT THAT THEY COULDN’T RECALL THE ALLEGED INCIDENT OF THAT HUGE STORY. BUT THE TIMES TOOK IT OUT OF THEIR OWN ARTICLE.>>I THINK WHAT HAPPENED ACTUALLY WAS THAT WE HAD HER NAME. AND YOU KNOW, “THE TIMES” DOESN’T USUALLY INCLUDE IT. IN REMOVING HER NAME, THEY REMOVED THE OTHER REFERENCE TO THE FACT THAT SHE DIDN’T REMEMBER. IT WAS SORT OF EDITING DONE IN A HASTE.>>Greg: SO THIS HUMONGOUS DETAIL DISAPPEARED IN THE HASTE OF THE EDITING PROCESS. THAT’S LIKE SAYING THAT WE LEFT OUT THE FACT THAT THE TITANIC SANK. THIS WAS NO ERROR. THIS WAS A BUSINESS DECISION. WHEN THE VICTIM RENOUNCED HER OWN VICTIMHOOD, THEY RENOUNCED IT. THEY SUGGESTED SUBSTANCE ABUSE. HOW DO THEY STILL HAVE JOBS? AND WHAT ABOUT HER ALLIES WHO THREATENED TO SUE ONE WITNESS? SHE DIDN’T BACK UP HER STORY. THAT’S PRETTY HUGE TOO. SOMEHOW THAT GOT IGNORED TOO. BUT THIS IS THE MEDIA. THE ONLY REASON THAT THIS HASN’T HAPPENED TO YOU, VIEWER, IS THAT THEY DON’T CONSIDER YOU IMPORTANT ENOUGH. SOONER OR LATER, THEY WILL REPORT REPUBLICANS, FAMILIES AND BUSINESSES OF REPUBLICANS. THEY WORK BACKWARDS, ERASING ANY FACTS THAT HINDER THEIR REVERSE ENGINEERING. AND SO, KAVANAUGH. IN TIME, THOUGH DO THIS TO YOU IF YOU EVER MAKE THEIR RADAR, BECAUSE THE INSTITUTIONAL MEDIA IS IN A PANIC. IT’S ALL SELF-INFLICTED. EMILY, IT’S INTERESTING. THE REPORTERS GENTLY THROUGH THE EDITORS UNDER THE BUS. AND THEN WHEN THEY TALKED ABOUT THE VICTIM NOT COOPERATING, THEY WERE LIKE, OH, SHE’S PROBABLY DRUNK.>>Emily: YOU KNOW ONCE A WHAT I>>Emily: YOU KNOW ONCE A WHAT M SICK OF? I’M SICK OF BEING TAKEN FOR AN IDIOT. IT’S LIKE, OH, YOU WON’T KNOW. YOU WON’T CARE. SO WHY DON’T YOU JUST TAKE WHAT I GIVE YOU AND DIGEST IT? IN THE PROCESS OF DEMOCRACY DYING IN DARKNESS. I REALLY HATE THIS HYPOCRISY COMING OUT OF THE LEFT, WHERE ONCE AGAIN, THEY ARE TELLING SOMEONE, “OH HERE HONEY. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED. BUT OH, YOUR STRUGGLES WITH MOONSHINE ARE THE REASONS WHY YOU CAN’T REMEMBER.” THIS CREATED SUCH A RIPPLE EFFECT IN TERMS OF SHAM JOURNALISM. JUST LAST MONTH, IT WAS SOLIDIFIED THAT A NOW PROFESSOR, BUT ONE OF KAVANAUGH’S CLASSMATES SUED “THE HUFFINGTON POST” OVER THE ARTICLE OF. THEIR INSINUATIONS, OR ACTUALLY THERE DECLARATIONS THAT HE PROVIDED THE DRUGS THAT HE OVERDOSED OVER. THEY LITERALLY DEFAMED HIM MORE. AND NOW, THEIR STORY, BY THE WAY HE DOES NOT EVEN MENTION THE DEATH OF DAVID KENNEDY AND THE O.D. IN 1984. THEY BASICALLY DUG A HOLE EVEN DEEPER.>>Greg: IN AN EFFORT TO GET TWEETED BY DONALD TRUMP, I’M GOING TO SAY TO YOU THAT JOURNALISM IS DEAD AND “THE NEW YORK TIMES” KILLED IT.>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAH,>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHW>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHE>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHN>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHI>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHH>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHA>>Jesse: >>Juan: YEAHD YOU SAY THAT, “THE NEW YORK TIMES” IS HIGHLY PROFITABLE THESE DAYS.>>Greg: YEAH, I MEAN, THEY ARE LYING TO AMERICA. IMAGINE IF HILLARY SAID THAT. HARVEY WEINSTEIN WOULD BE HAPPY, BECAUSE THAT STORY WHEN IT HAVE HAPPENED.>>Juan: WELCOME I THINK “THE NEW YORK TIMES” MADE A BIG MISTAKE. I DON’T THINK IT’S AN INSIGHT INTO LEFT-WING POLITICS IN THIS COUNTRY. IN MY MIND, THIS WAS NOT A COORDINATED ASSAULT, SORT OF BY AN ALL-POWERFUL LIBERAL MEDIA INSTITUTION. YOU KNOW WHAT, I WOULD SAY, IF THAT WAS THE CASE, IF THEY WERE UP AT INSTINCTS, I THINK THEY WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING ABOUT HIM, BUT THEY NEVER SAID ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THEY SAID SOMETHING ABOUT KAVANAUGH. AND I THINK THE SECOND THING. NO, I THINK THAT THE IDEA WAS, REMEMBER, THEY DID NOT ALLOW HIM A LEGITIMATE SHOT AT HAVING NOT ONLY A BOAT, BUT A SIMPLE HEARING. SO I THINK THAT IF YOU WERE SAYING, OH, YEAH, THEY COULD ATTACK ANYONE, THEY DID NOT. I THINK THE REAL ISSUE IS, ONE, THE FBI AGAIN, LACK OF INVESTIGATION. HEY, YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING. THERE WAS A PIECE IN THE PAPERS TODAY –>>Jesse: DONE WHAT?>>Juan: THEY SHOULD HAVE INVESTIGATED.>>Jesse: DONE WHAT?>>Juan: I WAS JUST ABOUT TO TELL YOU. HE WROTE THAT HE WAS AT YALE AT THAT TIME. HE CONTACTED THE FBI. 25 OTHER PEOPLE. NOBODY EVER GOT A RESPONSE VARIED AND NOW YOU HAVE PEOPLE SAYING, “I THINK, HARRIS DID THIS. IT’S NECESSARY TO LOOK AT THE CONSTRAINTS PUT ON THE FBI.>>Jesse: YOU CAN’T INVESTIGATE SOMETHING WHERE NOBODY SAW ANYTHING HAPPENED. YOU’RE SAYING 25 WELL-CONNECTED YALE GRADUATES CAN’T GET THE WORD OUT IN WASHINGTON, D.C., ? COME ON, JUAN. IT’S RIDICULOUS, JUAN. I WOULD LIKE TO CONGRATULATE MYSELF FOR CORRECTLY PREDICTING YESTERDAY THAT “THE NEW YORK TIMES” PURPOSELY LET THIS SLIDE, BECAUSE THIS WAS NOT A MISTAKE. THIS WAS DONE INTENTIONALLY. AND TODAY, WE KNOW IT WAS DONE INTENTIONALLY BY THE EDITORS WHO TOOK IT OUT. SO IF YOU ARE A “NEW YORK TIMES” EDITOR, HERE’S YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS. ANTI-SEMITIC CARTOONS. THAT STAYS IN. YOU GOT TO EDIT THAT OUT. THE MONOLOGUE ABOUT THIS WOMAN WHO WAS PRESSURED AND THREATENED TO LIVE TO THE FBI AND SAY THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED THAT SHE DIDN’T BELIEVE HAPPENED, THE GUY THAT IS SAYING THAT HE DIDN’T WITNESS THIS MISCONDUCT, HE HEARD ABOUT MISCONDUCT, HE WORKED FOR BILL CLINTON, AND YOU KNOW WHO WAS ON THE OPPOSING SIDE OF THAT BATTLE? BRETT KAVANAUGH DURING THE IMPEACHMENT BATTLE, BECAUSE WE TELL MIKE HE WAS ON HIS TEAM. THAT WAS ALSO LEFT OUT OF THIS WHOLE THING. THAT’S THE ONLY THING THAT SAVED HIM BACK THEN. AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE ARE UPSET ABOUT KAVANAUGH, I MEAN, YEAH. THIS IS UPSETTING TO HIM AND HIS FAMILY. THEY DO THIS TO DONALD TRUMP EVERY SINGLE DAY. THINK ABOUT WHAT WAS LEFT OUT ABOUT THE RUSSIAN COLLUSION STORY. BRENNAN, KLAPPER, McCABE. NOW THEY ARE STILL LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.>>Greg: IT’S TRUE, I CAN NEVER LOOK AT “THE NEW YORK TIMES” THE SAME WAY AGAIN.>>Dana: YOU DON’T HAVE TO. YOU HAVE OTHER OPTIONS. YOU ARE AN AMERICAN. YOU HAVE OTHER OPTIONS.>>Greg: THIS STORY IS HUGE.>>Dana: YET, BUT IT ALSO SHOWS WHAT SHE SAID A YEAR AGO AT THE SAME TIME, WHERE SHE IS LIKE, “OH WAIT. ACTUALLY NO.” WHEN JUAN SAID THAT THIS WAS NOT AN INSIGHT INTO IT, I DISAGREE, BECAUSE AS SOON AS THAT STORY POSTED, YOU HAD SEVERAL DEMOCRATIC 2020 CANDIDATES SAYING THAT HE MUST BE IMPEACHE IMPEACHED. THEY CAN’T WAIT FOR HALF A SECOND. YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE JUDGMENT. A RUSH OF JUDGMENT. YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT HOW RASH THAT IS. THE OTHER THING I WOULD SAY ABOUT THIS WHOLE THING IS IN 2004 AND FIVE, ZERO FOUR, ’05. IN ZERO FIVE, I WAS ONE OF THE SPOKESPEOPLE FOR IT. IT WAS A VERY CONTROVERSIAL NOMINATION. THIS WAS NEVER BROUGHT UP. NOT ONCE. WHAT THEY WENT AFTER HIM FOR IN 2005 WAS TORTURE AND WHETHER HE HAD WRITTEN A MEMO ALONG THE WAY THAT ENCOURAGED THE PRESIDENT TO SAY, “YES. OKAY. YOU CAN SIGN OFF ON TORTURE.” I DO THINK THAT BRETT KAVANAUGH SHOULD SUE. I THINK HE WOULD WIN. I THINK IT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE. HOW ABOUT THAT?>>Greg: WOW. ALL RIGHT. I THINK WE’RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THIS LATER IN THE SHOW, DANA.>>Emily: IT’S RIGHT HERE. [LAUGHS]>>Greg: I’M JUST TEASING, DANA.>>Emily: I’M SO CONFUSED.




Comments
  1. The haste of the waste …. yep, the NY Time-less entertains the lesser intelligent once again! Start your lawsuit (s) Kavanaugh !

  2. I think that Juan Williams is sort of unfair on the Merritt Garland nomination. We all know that the Dems like Obama have been stocking our courts with leftist in order to politicize the courts to block all conservative reform efforts. They have done this to Trump as well. So presumably Obama wanted another leftist on the court who would side with the leftists against any sort of conservative issues like stopping illegal immigration and creating ever greater Democrat voting demographics and an ever greater welfare state and unlimited abortions. So, perhaps Obama should not have gotten the chance. He never passed up chances to use dirty tricks against political competitors.

  3. Obama made the law in 2013 that the Media can use Propaganda against the American public without consequences. No one talks about this.

  4. I think Even an 88yr old Great-Grandmother sitting at home reading this BS on close-caption could easily discern that the Campaign against Kavanaugh was just so much Bovine Fertillizer.

  5. Can anyone tell me a physical address I can use to send Gregg a small unicorn item to add to his "life is a unicorn" collection? I would so appreciate the help.

  6. But didn't NYT put the women's name in the tweet? And the tweet implied that the alleged victim was saying it happened when she in fact did not say that. The author of the book wrote the tweet fully knowing that Deborah Ramirez did not "say"anything of the sort. So protecting the alleged victim name excuse is a boldface lie

  7. The very ugly soul of dena and Juan are so evident. Dana is a sheep in wolves clothing beware her husband and her speak of us very poorly when they are together. Please be where that’s one ugly person fake. She cakes it on very good when she looks in the mirror but deep down she knows she is a disgrace

  8. All these accidental omissions, errors, mistakes, etc…..ALWAYS….ALWAYS somehow happen in favor of democrats and end up smearing Trump and people on the right. Its very interesting how leftist media works. Yeah, juan is a leftist idiot shill.

  9. Juan Williams is in total denial as to what is the truth, and what is a lie. I feel for his family, he's truly a loser!

  10. Trump didn't want to be President. He just wanted to showed taxpayers what the politions have been doing to you. Less than a year after hawkings died they got a grainy picture of the black hole? Epstein gets murdered and we are concentrating on this guy? We are seeing them shake keys in front of your face to turn you away from something else

  11. Kamala Harris said? Thats not an authority. Thats a hack with zero credibility. Ny times is only doing well because they mail out their newspaper on auto pay. They scammed readers

  12. I remember when I was a child the neighbors had a parakeet, I remember what he used the New York Times for….smart bird….

  13. Leftspaining = When leftist are wrong on something and tell people how they are in some way still right, or find someone else to blame for their incompetence or ignorance.

  14. Juan begins all his responses with, “I was listening to what is being said”. This is code for: I’m going to ignore all the facts you presented that don’t suit my argument and come up some anti-Trump fiction. I know he’s meant to provide a balance but he just isn’t credible.

  15. These NYT “journalists” will probably be receiving an award soon for their detailed reporting on this latest (non) allegation. The ceremony will be hosted by NBC.

  16. The New York Times wasn't trying to protect the woman ….. They were trying to make the story more sensational, more of a "bombshell"…. journalism is dead and buried

  17. This is no different than socialist,communist propaganda! A page out of the Putin book of dictatorship. What's next should concern us all. The NYT is ruled by dictators and socialist?? Enemies of Democracy!!

  18. It's funny how so many of the outlets that pretend to be appalled by being called fake news, are turning out to be just that.

  19. What exactly is the point of Juan Willaims, to provide a veneer of "balance" to the show, or to help amplify left-wing noise / do damage control? It would make a better show if your panel could dig deeply into issues, instead of just dealing with Williams throwing out spin, misinformation, and shutting down each topic. Most FOX shows are similarly limited by this pretense of "balance", where we pretend liberals are in the audience, like anyone cares whether FOX is "fair and balanced". Come on, it's obvious that half your staff are never Trumpers — just boot them and be the only channel that pushes back against this wall of lies collapsing on us constantly. Let them hate you for leaning right, please. No one cares, no one will fault you for it.

  20. Juan is either naive or stupid, or both. Anyone would half a brain cell knows that the NYT set out to mislead and defame with this hit piece.

  21. Juan you are full of it and your a walking duche bag why are you constantly standing up for criminals probably your one too stupid.

  22. A story ( smolking gun ) where they want to give you a pill to get you easier indoctrinated……imagine that!!!!

    The bad news is they already infected our foods to reach the same goal because all people are indoctrinated…..example:
    Why are people paying for their cars?
    That sounds crazy!!! …but its n big YES! because your own bank show you on their own website calculator proving you that its 100% true …..do not pay for your car…there is a way to do it…..Read Isaiah 55:1…..buy without money!

  23. 5,9 k people thumbed this up… But my question is… When are you 5,9 k thumber uppers and 251 310 viewers of this show going to take the street and demand reparations, demand that the top guys lose their jobs, that Nadler the impeach OCD psychopath be impeached? You watch this as a show… but you do realize this continuous show, this clown fest is costing you more millions every week right? You realize all of this fest is going to have to be paid for right? Destroying your President's winning and economy… You realize this is a two fold attack right? One, impeachment of the President you voted for, and two, sucking out the money the President has put in your pockets through unfathomable fights… You want to keep your win? When are you watchers going to say IT'S ENOUGH??????????? When are you watchers going to fight for your president? You realize they also try to assassinate him constantly right? WHEN ARE YOU SO CALLED PATRIOTS GOING TO FIGHT FOR HIM?

  24. Juan Williams. Delusional Democrat. That guy should retire. I remember all of his b.s. reporting when he was on NPR then they booted him. Fox needs a smarter Demo Rep . . . if they can find one . . .

  25. Yes Juan there has been a lack of investigation on the behalf of the FBI… in the case of Hillary Clinton. You never cease to amaze me with your willful blindness to the sins of the left.

  26. Liberals of the ctrl-left lie, in case you missed the memo. Remember when the Natl Enquirer broke the John Edwards story?

  27. O' Donnel journalistically failed when he failed to correct the statement of the NY Times propagandist when she stated " The Victim…blah,blah". The correct verbage would be " The alleged victim", as Kavanaugh is innocent until proven guilty by 12 jurors that would need no possible doubt of his guilt, based on actual factual evidence, not the printed or spiken claims of the Seditious NY Times staff, all of whome are guilty of violating Code 18-2483 U.S. Statutory law. Read this statute yourself, confirm your own biases. I give no links or sources because I AM THE SOURCE.

  28. How many other times has Kavanaugh been vetted for lower court positions? And none of this ever came up during those background checks. Why are these people coming out now? It's not about Kavanaugh it's about beating Trump at anything and they keep failing. They are not smart enough to beat Trump

  29. The New York Times is a complete joke…it should be sold in rolls rather than pages. Does Juan ever grow tired of making up excuses for the fascist left?

  30. So the NYT just didn't want to publish a "victim's" name. Ok, I get that… But why would they have considered her a victim, if the part in question is where she says she doesn't remember it? O.o

  31. Why dosn't Kavanaugh sue the New York times for defamation.?
    Trial by media is a gross injustice
    & denial of presumed innocence.
    It is time they are made accountable. America needs to grow a pair…

  32. We need to investigate something that didn't happen! If we don't find the guilty evidence then it is a conspiracy to hide the truth!!!

  33. I am starting to watch the video.. IF JUAN utters one effing word defending TNYT.. I am not watching this effing show again.
    Okey he spoke .. I am unsubscribing

  34. How is it that Juan regularly fails to see what's obvious to almost everyone else? Williams has a creepy quality, alright, like he only pretends to care. His understanding level could be superficial, and FOX thinks it is entertaining to let him go unchecked.

  35. So we have a choice here
    Believe the NYTwit reporters are stupid
    Believe the NYTwit editors are stupid
    Believe both groups are stupid
    Tough decision!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *