Charles Darwin Biography: Evolution and Religion


Charles Darwin, the mild mannered son of a
physician, was once described as the most dangerous man in England. In fact many people considered him to be the
agent of the Devil himself, come to sow seeds of corruption among the faithful. His ideas struck like a storm at the very
foundation of society, turning conventional religious thought on its head. Yet just a few years earlier he had his sights
set on becoming priest and devoting his life to God. In this week’s Biographics we investigate
the life and ideas of Charles Darwin. Early Years Charles Robert Darwin was born in Shrewsbury,
England on February 12th, 1809. His father, Robert, was a doctor, and his
mother Susannah was the daughter of the famous potteries owner, Josiah Wedgwood. Charles’ grandfather was Erasmus Darwin,
well known in his time as a scientist with unusual ideas. He wrote on a range of subjects including
travel by air, exploring by submarine and evolution. Despite his learned father and eminent grandfather,
Charles’ early years were not outstanding. He attended Shrewsbury School, where the main
lessons were in the classics, such as Latin. His school masters, and his father, considered
him to be a boy of very ordinary intelligence. Despite his apparent lack of promise, Charles
showed a great interest in learning. But, rather than studying Greek and Latin
like most students of the time, he was taken with the English poetry of William Wordsworth
and Lord Byron. When Charles was a teenager, science began
to captivate him, so much so, in fact, that he and his brother Erasmus built a chemistry
lab in a garden shed. In 1825, Charles attended Edinburgh Medical
School in Scotland, but he was not a good medical student. He found the lectures dull, and he had to
leave the operating theatre because he could not stand the horrors of surgery. One thing he did enjoy was the study of taxidermy,
which he learned from a former African slave named John Edmonstone. A Growing Fascination During his second year in Scotland, Darwin
joined the Plinian Society, a club for naturalists. He was taken with their intellectual debates,
which exposed him to ideas of how man was created, not by God, but by gradual changes
in form over time. These ideas had been espoused by Charles’
own grandfather, Erasmus Darwin. While at the university, Darwin met a zoologist
named Robert Grant, and the two became close friends. Grant has been credited with being the first
person to interest Darwin in the theory of evolution. At this time, Charles began collecting fossils
and learning more about animal life. To the great disappointment of his father,
Charles quit Medical School in 1827. He joined his uncle, Josiah Wedgwood II for
a trip to Paris. As he vacationed, his father, still fretting
over his son dropping out of medical school, made plans for Charles to study for the clergy,
enrolling him at Christ’s College at Cambridge University. Despite the evolutionary ideas that had been
filling his mind during his time at Edinburgh, Charles still held to a belief in creation. Later he wrote, “I did not then in the least
doubt the strict and literal truth of every word in the Bible.” During the summer, before his studies began,
Charles fell in love with a girl by the name of Fanny Owen, the sister of one of his friends. They spent long hours talking, riding horses
and playing cards. Darwin’s theological studies at Cambridge
began towards the end of 1827. But, rather than getting immersed in the Bible,
he developed a fondness for collecting beetles. He attended lectures on botany given by the
Reverend John Stevens Henslow. Darwin saw this as a possible career path,
and he pursued his studies with enthusiasm. By 1829, it became clear that Darwin had no
interest in joining the clergy. He spent that spring break with the Reverend
Frederick Hope, a noted entomologist. His obsession with the study of beetles saw
no time for his budding romance with Fanny and they broke up the following spring. Despite his general lack of interest in his
clerical studies, Darwin passed his final exams in January, 1831, placing tenth in his
class. Finished with school he was all set to become
a countryside clergy, albeit one with deep scientific interest. But, Reverend Henslow, who had become a mentor
to Charles, suggested that he should see some of the world before settling down to a clergical
posting. Darwin decided to take a trip to the Canary
Islands, off the coast of Spain. He planned to go with his friend Marmaduke
Ramsay. They intended to study the geological formations
on the islands. But, before they could set sail, Ramsay died
suddenly. Darwin was stricken with grief and could not
travel to the islands. A few weeks later, though, he received a letter
from Reverend Henslow, informing him that there was an opening on a ship that may interest
him – the HMS Beagle, which was bound for South America. A 5 Year Voyage The Beagle was being prepared as one of several
ships scheduled to map South America. Robert Fitzroy, the captain of the Beagle,
recognized that the long voyage would require that a variety of men be onboard for companionship. He was keen to have a scholar-gentleman who
could help describe the areas that were being charted, as well to relieve the tedium between
ports of call. When the opening presented itself, Darwin
was keen to fill the spot. However, his father, Robert, refused to give
his adult son permission to embark on the voyage. Robert continued to believe that Charles’
interest in science was merely a passing fad and that the young man remained adrift. It was left to Charles’ uncle, Josiah, to
step in and persuade his brother to give permission for his son to join the expedition. Charles then hastened to London to meet with
Captain Fitzroy in the hope that the offer was still available. He was in luck, with plans for a September
departure gradually moved back. The ship finally set sail on Tuesday, December
27th, 1831. Darwin found himself in a small cabin that
was was nine by eleven feet long and only five feet high. Part of the cabin was taken up with one of
the masts rising through it. From the start he was seasick, a condition
that remained over the next five years. On January 16, 1832, the Beagle stopped at
the Cape Verde Islands, off the western coast of Africa. Here Darwin found a band of fossil shells
forty-five feet above sea level. How, he wondered, could the fossils rise so
high. After twenty-three days, the crew set out
for Brazil, arriving in the port city of Salvador at the end of February 1832. Throughout the spring, the Beagle traveled
along the Brazilian coast, stopping in many ports. At each stop, Darwin took long hikes, collecting
many specimens. He collected a huge number of specimens which
he carefully catalogued and protected onboard. Fitzroy and the crew considered his work worthless
and his growing collection a load of junk, but to Charles they were precious scientific
discoveries. Every few months he arranged for shipment
to be sent back to Reverend Henslow in Cambridge for safekeeping. From Brazil the Beagle sailed to Patagonia,
a large region of South America that is now Argentina.There Darwin collected fossils,
bits of bone, and feathers that he had never before encountered. He struggled to accurately record their features
in the hopes that more experienced naturalists could later help to identify them. From Patagonia, the Beagle went further south
to Tierra del Fuego. It was here that Darwin encountered native
people who still dwelled in the jungle and were considered to be savages by the Europeans. My March, 1833, the crew of the Beagle began
mapping the Falkland Islands, which the British had claimed from Argentina just months earlier. Fascinated by bird and animal fossils found
there, Darwin spent his time comparing the specimens with everything he had collected
to date. The work that Darwin was immersed in was becoming
so exhaustive that he recognized the need to take on a servant. He wrote home to his father asking for the
money to hire someone. When permission came back, he asked the ship’s
odd-job man, Syms Covington, to take the role. Meanwhile, the letters that Charles had been
sending back to Reverend Henslow, were being read aloud to the Philosophical Society of
Cambridge. This earned Darwin an early reputation as
an excellent naturlaist and observer. On Darwin’s twenty-fifth birthday, Captain
Fitzroy named the highest mountain in the Terra del Fuego region Mount Darwin, in Charles’
honor. By April, 1834, the ship had sailed round
Cape Horn at the southern tip of South America and crossed from the Atlantic to the Pacific
Ocean. During the summer, Darwin became quite ill. He was deemed too sick to continue the voyage
and spent four frustrating months in Tierra del Fuego recovering. Historians believe that he had Chagas Disease,
which is a form of sleeping sickness. Darwin returned to the Beagle in November,
1834. The ship rounded Cape Horn and sailed up South
America’s west coast. On February 20th 1835, a great earthquake
shook the region. Entering the port of Concepcion, Chile, Darwin
saw the appalling damage. He also noted that the rocks around the harbor
had been lifted almost a metre by the earth movements. Shellfish and seaweeds which were normally
near the water were now high and dry. Could such catastrophic changes in the surroundings
be linked to changes in plants and animals, he wondered. The Beagle now left South America and set
sail across the Pacific Ocean. Almost 1,000 kilometers from the mainland
it anchored at a group of about 13 small rocky islands on the Equator. These were the Galapagos Islands. Darwin was immediately struck by the strange
nature of the birds, reptiles and other others he found there. They seemed unique to these islands, yet they
had many similarities to species found on the South American mainland. Stranger still, each island had its own kind
of the animal in question. One example was the giant tortoises, weighing
more than 200 kilograms, which the ship’s crew rode like horses. The local people could tell which island a
tortoise come from by the shape of its shell. Darwin was especially intrigued by one group
of birds, the finches. They were mostly small and drab brown in color. But each species had a slightly different
size and shape of beak, allowing it to tackle a certain kind of food. Darwin noted in his notebook . . . One might really fancy that from an original
paucity of birds in the archipelago one species had been taken and modified for different
ends. The idea of evolution was taking root. The Beagle sailed on across the Pacific to
Tahiti, where Darwin fell in love with the misty peaks, tropical plants, colorful animals
and the simple, natural lifestyle of the local people. The journey continued on towards New Zealand
and then Australia. He was shocked at the terrible living conditions
of the local people. In their own lands, they were ruled over and
made slaves by the European settlers. This seemed to support his observations from
the animal world, that the stronger always took over from the weaker. A Theory Evolves The Beagle returned to Falmouth, England on
2nd October, 1836. They had been away for five years. Darwin spent the next few years organizing
and cataloguing his vast collection of plants, animals,rocks and fossils. By the summer of 1838, Darwin felt bold enough
to share his radical ideas with his father, who took them in his stride. During the last several months, Charles had
struck up a close relationship with his cousin, Emma Wedgwood. However, when he brought up the subject of
marrying Emma, his father warned that she came from a very strict family – Emma’s
family would never consider Darwin’s theories as anything but heresy. Deeply in love, Darwin ignored his father’s
advice to curtail the romance. He mentioned some of his notions regarding
religion and nature to Emma, who was surprisingly understanding. Darwin juggled numerous tasks, from writing
books to studying more fossils, to watching apes and orangutans at the London Zoo. As he worked, he also continued his relationship
with Emma. He proposed to her on November 11th, 1838. The proposal was well received by both sides
of the family. Arrangements were made for Darwin to receive
a handsome annual sum of money from his father. This would allow the couple to live comfortably,
while Darwin continued retaining Covington’s services, since research on his theory of
evolution was still incomplete. Charles and Emma were married on january 29th,
1839. The couple settled into a home in London,
which was already filled with scientific material. Shortly thereafter, Covington left Darwin’s
employment to make his own fortune. He was replaced by a man named Joseph Parslow. During the spring of 1839, Darwin carried
out research on cross-breeding. He asked various experts, including farmers,
questions about how they crossbred their animals. He filled page after page with his correspondences. In May, the multi-volume collection he wrote
with Captain Fitzroy, Narrative of the Surveying Voyages of HMS Beagle, was finally released
to the public. This celebration of the Beagle’s voyage
became a bestseller. Charles was now a respected scientist and
author and a member of the Royal Society. A Respected Scientist During the 1840’s and 1850’s, Darwin continued
his research and writing. In 1842, he wrote a geology book entitled
The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs, with two more geology books following in the
next few years. As time went on his health began to fail. He could only do a few hours’ work each
day. His illness was never identified, but it could
have been the after effects of his tropical sickness while on his five year voyage. Despite his illness, he continued his research
into the idea of evolution. He was becoming more convinced that species
were not fixed and immutable. He had written a short version of his ideas
in 1842, but decided to collect every scrap of information he could and write a lengthy
book with masses of evidence for his theory. For many years, Darwin was reluctant to publish
his ideas on evolution by natural selection. It meant that animals and plants evolved naturally. He now believed that God had not created them. However, most people at the time- including
many scientists – still believed in the truth of the Bible. He knew that speaking out against the accepted
teachings of the Bible was certain to offend and cause a storm of protest. The Book That Shocked the World Darwin may have never finished his work on
evolution but for a letter which arrived at his home in Kent in June, 1885 from Malaysia. It was from another English naturalist, Alfred
Wallace. Wallace knew that Darwin was interested in
evolution. So, with his letter he sent his summary of
the theory. Darwin was amazed. All the work he had done so patiently over
the past twenty years was neatly described by Wallace. At a scientific meeting at the Linnean Society
in London, the works of both Wallace and Darwin were read out in July, 1858. After that, Wallace agreed that Darwin, who
had gathered far more evidence to support their joint theory, should carry on with the
idea while he stood aside. Darwin did so, quickly finishing his great
book. It was published on 24th November 1859 and
called The Origin of Species. The publisher of Darwin’s book, John Murray,
read it before printing, and realized a great outcry would follow. As a result he only printed 1,250 copies. These sold out almost at once, and a second
edition was quickly produced. People were indeed outraged. Darwin was denying the truth of the Bible! Scientist lined up to have their say, with
many criticizing Dawin. One clergyman called the quiet, mild-mannered
Darwin ‘the most dangerous man in England.’ But others quickly recognized the good science
in Darwin’s ideas, and the vast amount of evidence which supported them. The biologist Thomas Huxley spoke for him
in England, while professor of botany at Harvard University, Asa Gray, was his great supporter
in North America. Darwin himself stayed in Kent and took little
part in the arguments. So what did Darwin actually postulate in his
famous book? The Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life is a long but
very readable book. It begins by looking at variation under domestication,
including pigeons, horses and garden flowers. Then it covers variation in nature and the
problems of identifying a species. It shows how the offspring of parents are
all similar, but slightly different. These slight differences might give an individual
a better chance of succeeding and staying alive. Later chapters deal with animal instincts,
fossils and the geographical manner of animals and plants, from mice to elephants, asparagus
to furze bushes. Yet he never explains the origin of any one
species. The Origin of Species shocked and angered
many people, including Darwin’s own family. To accept the theory of evolution meant accepting
that the account in the Bible of creation of animal and plant species could not be true. Many scientists struggled to believe in both. Gradually, however, the theory of evolution
by natural selection gained ground, and most scientist came to believe that Darwin was
right. Darwin did not retire after The Origin of
Species was published. He kept up his studies and researches, and
carried on with his experiments and nature observations. In 1871 he published Descent of Man and Selection
in Relation to Sex. In this work he concluded that humans are
not the result of special creation, but that they have evolved, along with other animals. Their ancestors could be traced far back into
prehistory. In the 1870’s Darwin’s health improved,
and in 1877 he was awarded a special degree by Cambridge University. He continued to write books, about insect
eating plants, how plants grow and move, and how they encourage decay and enrich the soil. With Descent a huge success as well, Darwin
divided his time between revising the two works. In April, 1874, he completed work on Descent’s
second edition. This was the last time he wrote about evolution. Between projects and illnesses, Darwin continued
to refine his work. A decade after its first publication, the
fifth Edition of Origin was released. The sixth edition, published in 1871, used
the word evolution for the first time. After a mild heart attack in December, 1881,
Charles Darwin died peacefully at Down House, his home of nearly 50 years. He was 73 years of age. By this time the storm of protest over The
Origin of Species had died away and Darwin had become a national figure and one of the
best-known scientific names of all time. He was laid to rest at Westminster Abbey,
London, next to the great Isaac Newton. The funeral was attended by dozens of politicians,
inventors, explorers, scientists and artists, along with members of the scientific communities of many countries.




Comments
  1. Darwin was an idoit evolpolution, it's a theory not a fact, so why do people live like its truth even compulsive in schools . Darwin was a balloon.

  2. It is shameful, dishonest and a great disservice to the public to omit the most important part of Darwin's Origin of the Species. Why did you not include Darwin's conclusion? He clearly states – " ….There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." Charles Darwin – 1859

    Why wouldn't you make that a part of your "documentary"?  Why have you twisted Darwin's actual theories into a narrative of random stardust exploding out of nothing, colliding into itself, forming single cell protoplasms which magically become all the species of the earth? 

    You know that is not what he said.

  3. You guys do a good job your biographies are pretty unbiased considering most of the subjects are very controversial

  4. Probably both ideas are true a bit of creation in the very beginning and I dictation in some sort of mutating evolution periodically as well. Remembering that God after all is infinite and as part of all matter within the universe and as such I can do what it bloody well wants ha ha!

  5. I'm going to say this. The Bible simply states that God created life, but Darwin described how it came about and flourished. Personally I just see how it changed over time through biological adaptation, but how it all began in the very beginning that still needs to be studied. The fact that the Bible suggests we come from the Earth (clay or dust if you care) hints something, but by itself is not enough. The fact that we are made from many elements found in nature i.e. iron, calcium, etc. also suggests something about our creation. In other words we still need to study more what was started long ago.

  6. Darwin was a great scientist for his time , though DNA research is now taking the wheels off of evolution , it does not negate the fact that darwins theory lasted longer than most scientific theories , for a 150 yrs from now the wheels will be coming off of DNA , as Darwin himself said "time renders all theories obsolete ".

  7. If you believe in Darwin's theory of evolution you'll believe in anything!

    Note: Archaeologists have discovered human remains, bones etc dated BC thousands of years dating back before the time of "Darwin's Theological Date of Evolution!"… Yes! Wake up people!
    Also there are conspiracies hiding these facts for fear of the truth exposing itself!

  8. And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.

    -Acts 16:31

    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    -John 3:16

  9. Argentina did not hold any claim to the Islands, please read up on the history of the matter if you are going to state something as fact in a video.

  10. "But it's only a Theory!"
    So is gravity and relativity…
    Theory in the scientific context means that it's repeatable to high grade of accuracy in practice and on paper.
    It's a Theory because you can "theoretically" calculate and predict it with such high accuracy that you can work it out on paper.

  11. On the idea "most dangerous man in England", maybe he was, but not for the reasons stated. His racial views presaged eugenics and Hitler's racial purity.

  12. Hang on.. the theory of natural selection was already know by the society he joined at the University, and even Charles’ grandfather Erasmus Darwin had talked about natural selection, Robert Grant introduced Charles to the theory of evolution. After this he still believed in creation. Invited on the Beagle as a means of combating loneliness for the team mapping out the south americas. He started collecting hundreds of beetles, finches & specimens. After 5 years abroad (all funded, even to hire an assistant) he came back from his working holiday. He married his cousin and then was given a house and a ‘handsome annual sum from his father. (Which I thought was something the bride’s father gave the husband’s family but never mind). (Minimum-wage girl here counting her pennies, you can imagine my contempt). He struggled to formulate his findings cohesively until Alfred Wallace helped him. So what Charles did was build on an already established theory (which took him about a decade to accept) and popularised it with countless examples in one book? So did he really “discover” anything by himself?

  13. Charles Darwin was not a real biological male but a generational secret freemasonic FTM transgender TRANSman originally born a girl with female DNA and turned to be a FAKE man he-FEMALE by testosterone and other freemasonic transgendering techs & stuffs. This Jewish brearded lady had a typical female skull, faminine oval face, small female cheek-bones, small nearby eyes, short neck and other ftm's bone/body structures & traits. S-He was actually an inverted- gender modern-day freemasonic SHE-Wolf "WITCH" in man's clothing who has bewitched tons of mankind and pushed into hell for her/his lord Satan by her/his fatal spells, so-called 'Darwinism'. Thomas Huxley was also a secret FTM transgender TRANSman having female skull & bone/body structures. This world has ruled by generational secret TRANNIES mimicking their Androgynous lords, Satan and other fallen angels.

  14. Long overdue, with love I point out, though what you say "the strongest take from the weakest" may be true, the principle behind evolution, is survival of the FITTEST, strength is not always fit for all survival scenarios the species are subjected to.

  15. Why do these animals claim darwin invented evolution? When it was his grandfather? Darwin was nothing but a parrot for others ideas.

  16. I really enjoyed this videos … now we know that chimps and humans are closely related like 99% so was Darwin right and did science prove him right that we evolved from apes .. I do believe in God but the bible has been proven wrong many times it was written by men many years after Jesus walked on the earth .. so how can we say for certain where we came from and that it wasn't God's plan

  17. You evolved from a species that moves their mouth in a normal way when they speak.
    Are you smoking a pipe on the right side?

  18. @16:14 So let me get this straight…in a book hailed by the scientific community as brilliant, bold, and audacious titled "The origin of species" …he never actually explains the origin of any one species?

    Surely you jest…

  19. Fun fact: Darwin had a tortoise that had he used for research, one a century later, the late and great Steve Irwin owned that very same tortoise for a short period of time before it died.

  20. Thank you for this amazing documentary. Can you please consider to make one about Gregor Johann Mendel – he gained posthumous recognition as the founder of the modern science of genetics. Though farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals and plants could favor certain desirable traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the rules of heredity, now referred to as the laws of Mendelian inheritance. Thank you.

  21. The extra, unnecessary pronouns were coming thick and fast in this vid, even compared to Simon's usual use of them…. but concise enough and informative as usual….

  22. Explaining God is a convenient excuse for christians to present absurdities.
    For you cannot get more ridiculous than a god who sacrifices himself (temporarily) to himself, to save his creation from himself.

  23. It is certainly no positive measure of Humanities Health and Well Being for so many to be well adjusted to the profoundly sick christian religion.

  24. I’ve been watching your videos for a while, you are an incredibly good orator. Thank you for the hours of entertainment and education!

  25. did this wheezer include when c darwin lost a daughter in death a priest told him she was in purgatory because if i remember correctly darwin did not attend mass regularly or i believe at all? which im sure c darwin then had a vendetta against God …first the catholic religion has never had anything good to do with
    God ( look up a history of popes ) also on a small isolated island where animals had to interbreed just to survive doesn't seem like a really bio-diverse place to get an accurate assessment of life on earth as the discovery channel promotes…just another antiquarian theory a grade school child could disprove ..in their denial of the extremely complex design of life that they can in no way replicate ( that always sounded wrong to me ) are their labs not more advanced that an amniotic pool in the open air? so with all their claims "we understand" and the trillions of dollars wasted ( in the last few years searching for the God particle) would irt not be easier to just say we were created …but to admit there is a higher form of intelligent life is just too much for their pride? gee read this wheezer …think, people.

  26. FYI Darwin never believed that the stronger took over the weaker as you have said. The phrase “survival of the fittest“, which was coined not by Darwin but by the philosopher Herbert Spencer, is widely misunderstood. In Darwins case fittest refered to how well a species FIT its environment and its viability of producing offspring.

  27. Ok, so let's face it, from a Christian perspective, he was a heretic….and placed some sort of a theory which is not fully accepted until to this day. Hence, a satanist 😉 thanks but no thanks. God is our creator, and ape-human linkage should remain in halls of theory and philosophical societies.

  28. God must be a beetle. They are his/her favorite type of animal. He made over one million different species of them, that's love.

  29. Is it part of our evolution to eventually discover evolution, the inevitable conclusion of any species? Lol

  30. The churches lost their minds when he was discovering that what the religious leaders were WRONG! If you're a fan of South Park, they did a funny but on point of how the religious leaders lost their minds.

  31. You know what's rather bizarre about religious groups who came to the "New World" for religious freedom. After arriving, they immediately imposed their will on there subjects in the church congregation as well as the very Natives who had accepted them. The Europeans began calling them heathen or savages. The Natives came in friendship. The Europeans came to convert them.

  32. Darwin was only of average IQ. Killing and collecting specimens was a common hobby of the upper class. The fact that living things change slowly in response to their environment-well, duh. THAT does prove there is no God. From a REAL genius: “It is man's natural sickness to believe that he possesses the truth.”

    ― Blaise Pascal

  33. I believe in God and I believe in evolution, truth is truth. God shaped the mountains through time and the forces of nature. Why couldn't He have made man the same way?

  34. I would love to see the life of Ayn Rand get the biographic treatment. Also, Truman Capone, the nation of Israel (I know it's not a life in the usual sense), Gypsy Rose Lee, I.M. Pei, Ian Fleming, Arthur Ashe and Mick Jagger.

  35. Excellent video; but for the fact that it postulates strict inconsistency between Christian Theism, and Evolution by Means of Natural Selection. No such inconsistency exists.

  36. Darwin was correct and honest. He clearly stated there was one problem with his theory that he could not explain and might invalidate at least parts of his theory of Evolution. On this he was correct too. Unfortunately, many who followed turned his theory into an unquestionable truth and any nay-sayers were heretical and must be ex-communicated (most people whether religious or not, have beliefs that they devoutly believe in). Yet modern synthesis advocates have been proven wrong and Darwin right that his theory as it stood was not be able to explain the mass speciation events (Darwin used the Cambrian explosion). It is now known that this is primarily driven by an aspect of epigenetics that modern synthesis can not explain. As such modern synthesis is fine for small genetic changes but not for large morphological changes nor mass speciation events. Which is why many are now searching for a new model to explain Evolution.

  37. Darwin was wrong about evolution. I suppose you could say he was disputing creation by God. That makes him guilty of the only sin that will never be forgiven… Blasphemy… Just like Stephen Hawkins and his big bang theory. You the one where there was this explosion caused by nothing. Empty space. Just a moron.

  38. I'd be interested in an episode on his uncle Erasmus. Obviously not as important to world history, but pretty fascinating nonetheless.

  39. I found out that there hiding PI/Fibonacci/Golden ratio…. Stands for 6 day work and one day rest 6.1 1.6 7
    From the Egyptian till now its even in the house adres of the White House 
    You can follow in a timeline where this was used in architecture… to make themselfs as gods
    They use this in everything from creditcards ect
    I was reschearching the water found on earth 70% as the human body
    And the moon doesnt have this how could it be that by chance and interval the water came here
    You’ll see that by rescheaching this that it isn’t by chance or interval 
    Creation is a fact…. 
    And I need smart people to help reschearch this.. if evolution was true bird man and all superhero, s would be fact!

  40. while I do appreciate you eventually including the complete title of the origin of species from Charles Darwin I do take issue with a few things. You never mentioned Charles Darwin's was a racist, also Darwin himself said if irreducible complexity was found it would disprove ALL of his work. I humbly submit the eyeball. Also his work covers micro evolution not macro. Human kind had never witnessed one species become another. If you disagree please feel free to submit an example.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *